The reasons that students struggle in school and the things with which they struggle are as varied as the students themselves. Many parents of struggling students immediately ask for a special education evaluation. Parents contact special education because they are aware of the existence of special education and they are hoping that they can get some help for their child.
What many of these parents are really looking for is just someone to help their child be successful in school. While special education is appropriate for some students, it is not appropriate for all students. Special education is a program that provides specially designed instruction designed to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability. In order to qualify for special education there must be first, a qualifying disability. The student must also require specialized instruction in order to access the curriculum. Specialized instruction could be a lot of different things. What qualifies as specialized instruction is too much to list in a blog post but it could be Braille, Sign Language, Specialized Academic Instruction, Social Skills or Speech and Language Therapy, among other things.
What if a child has a disability that interferes with a major life function and needs accommodations but not specialized instruction? Section 504 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to schools. Most schools refer to a 504 plan. The 504 plan is a listing of accommodations that the student will need in order to access the curriculum and an education. The accommodations that the student will need will depend on the type of disability the child has. If your child is in special education, a 504 plan is not necessary because the accommodations will already be in the IEP (Individualized Education Plan). Some examples of accommodations may be: use of the elevator, preferential seating, frequent breaks, a copy of notes provides, or any other necessary and reasonable accommodation.
Nearly all schools have programs available for students who are struggling but do not have a disability. These programs are commonly referred to as RTI or Response to Intervention. The model of RTI varies from school to school but the spirit remains the same. Students who are having difficulty are identified and referred to a team made up of teachers and/or specialists who determine what the student is struggling with and implement interventions designed to help the student be successful. The interventions may be behavioral or academic. Most interventions are delivered in the regular classroom. If the interventions in the classroom are not successful, the student may be pulled out for more intensive interventions. Once the student has achieved a level of mastery that he/she can be returned to the regular classroom, the intensive interventions are ended and the student is returned to the regular class but may continue to receive classroom interventions if they are necessary. If the pull out intervention is not successful, the student may be referred for an evaluation for special education or a 504 plan to determine whether or not the student may have a disability. Most students who enter RTI do not have disabilities and are successful in the regular classroom after interventions without a referral being made. For most struggling students, RTI should be the first step as it is typically successful. As the parent of a child in RTI, you should be kept informed of the progress your child is making.
If you have concerns about your child's performance in school, the best thing to do is to make an appointment with the teacher to discuss the concerns. This meeting should be a problem solving meeting where the concerns are discussed and ideas are shared. This should be a meeting free of blame or anger, everyone involved is trying to help the student be successful. It is important to be on the same team and open to hearing what the other has to say. You will likely find that the teacher has the same concerns and has already taken steps to help. Many people working together to find the right solution is the best way for a child to find success whatever success looks like for that child.
More Information:
ED.gov IDEA Website
Office of Civil Rights
National Center on Response to Intervention
Contact me
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Monday, January 21, 2013
What Does an IQ Test Really Mean?
In an evaluation for Special Education, the IQ or cognitive testing is only one piece of information that the team will consider when determining whether or not a child needs special education and/or related services. In addition to being considered for eligibility purposes, the IQ/cognitive testing can reveal areas of strength and weakness which can be valuable in educational planning. IDEA requires that multiple measures be used to determine eligibility for special education. The cognitive or IQ testing is examined in combination with the other testing to give an overall picture. It is important to remember that the scores from these tests alone are not an indicator of eligibility or ineligibility. Additionally, determining whether or not there is a disability and what that disability might be, should not be based on a single test. A person may have a high IQ score and still have a disability. Likewise, a person may have a low IQ score and not have a disability. Multiple measures, more information, is necessary to make that determination.
There are different tests that may be given that provide this information. Although the scoring varies slightly, most use standard scores. Standard scores compensate for different developmental levels by scoring based on norm references. This means that the age and gender of the test subject are taken into account and the scores are compared to others with similar attributes. The standard scores have a mean of 100 with a standard deviation of 15. What this tells you is that anything withing 15 points in either direction of the mean is considered "normal". An IQ score between 85 and 115 is in the normal range. The more standard deviations away from the mean a score is, the more unusual the result. For example, a score of 70 or 130 would both be scores that are not commonly seen. Additionally scores of 145 or 45 would be quite rare.
When reviewing scores from a cognitive test, it is important to pay attention not just to the overall score but also the scores in the sub-tests. A person may have normal scores in all areas but one. That one low area may be nothing to worry about. We all have areas of strength and weakness. For example, a low verbal comprehension score may be compensated for by a higher visual spacial score. However, a significant discrepancy should be looked at a little closer to make that determination. In our previous example, the team may want to consider a speech and language evaluation to rule out or confirm a problem.
The information in the testing will also give valuable information to a teacher. If a student has difficulty with verbal comprehension, the teacher should try to give the student written information in addition to verbal information. The IQ and cognitive testing can provide valuable information once we know what those numbers mean. It is okay to ask what the sub-tests are and what the student was asked to do. Remember, the goal is to get the whole picture, not just one piece of the puzzle.
There are different tests that may be given that provide this information. Although the scoring varies slightly, most use standard scores. Standard scores compensate for different developmental levels by scoring based on norm references. This means that the age and gender of the test subject are taken into account and the scores are compared to others with similar attributes. The standard scores have a mean of 100 with a standard deviation of 15. What this tells you is that anything withing 15 points in either direction of the mean is considered "normal". An IQ score between 85 and 115 is in the normal range. The more standard deviations away from the mean a score is, the more unusual the result. For example, a score of 70 or 130 would both be scores that are not commonly seen. Additionally scores of 145 or 45 would be quite rare.
When reviewing scores from a cognitive test, it is important to pay attention not just to the overall score but also the scores in the sub-tests. A person may have normal scores in all areas but one. That one low area may be nothing to worry about. We all have areas of strength and weakness. For example, a low verbal comprehension score may be compensated for by a higher visual spacial score. However, a significant discrepancy should be looked at a little closer to make that determination. In our previous example, the team may want to consider a speech and language evaluation to rule out or confirm a problem.
The information in the testing will also give valuable information to a teacher. If a student has difficulty with verbal comprehension, the teacher should try to give the student written information in addition to verbal information. The IQ and cognitive testing can provide valuable information once we know what those numbers mean. It is okay to ask what the sub-tests are and what the student was asked to do. Remember, the goal is to get the whole picture, not just one piece of the puzzle.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)